Open letter to Prime Minister of India and Member of Parliament in India on AFSPA

Greetings from PVCHR and Wide Angel.

Sir, we are happy to know that the Government of India is considering amendments to the Armed Forces Special Powers Act (AFSPA). The media reports about your active engagement with the main  opposition party for consensus building in this regard. We consider it as a positive development.

The Government of India in response to the face an extra ordinary situation placed the entire state of Manipur under the Armed Forces Special Powers Act 1958, (AFSPA) way back in 1980. At present, according to security analysts, there are around 44 underground groups operating across the state representing different religious and cultural identities. The civilian security personnel ratio according to a 2009 report is 40: 1, an indicator of a state in emergency. The security responses to the political crisis were unwarranted. Such measures have never worked in any part of the world. Regular election might give an impression of the presence of a legitimate government. But where is governance? The 'responsibility to rule' has shifted from a civilian government had tilted the balance of from a civilian government to man in uniform. Armed with extraordinary power, the security agencies engaged in fake killing, custodial killing, rape, and other forms of human rights violations with impunity.  The claim of foreign hand in perpetuating the crisis continues to hunt the government. Manipur chief minister Okram Ibobi Singh himself admits, "Over 12,000 security personnel and insurgents, and 8000 innocent people have lost their lives till date. People are insecure, angry, feel cheated and humiliated. 

It is necessary to understand the people of the state. How many times the Prime Minister of this country or the Leader of the Opposition leader in the parliament visited in the beleaguered state? Committees have been set up to look into the human rights violations undeniable under the constant pressures by the human rights groups from the state, as well as those working at the in the national and international level. Where are the reports? Justice B. P. Jeeven Reddy Commission, deputed to study and report to the Government of India about the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958 submitted its findings way back in 2005.  The Prime Minister of India responded by stating in a press conference that the law will be withdrawn as early as possible. Since then nothing is heard about the governments' plan to withdraw the law. Such open ended answers reflect the casualness of the government and hurt people.

The entire state and people in the rest of the country forget the brutal killing of Manorama Thangjam, 32, by the men of Assam Rifles in July, 2004 and the following public outcry?  How can the world forget grief-stricken angry women stripped naked in front of the Kangla Fort (headquarters of the Assam Rifles), demanding justice. Those are the shameful moments for each of us. The government unfortunately measures people's opinion through the reports filed by the security agencies. There is a clear disconnect between the centre and the people of the state on what form 'reason'. The state does not figure in the priority list of the government as well as the political parties due its low 'political premium'.

When the world recognizes and shows solidarity with the non violent protest of Irom Sharmila, that entered into the 7^th year for demanding establishment of rule of law and repeal of AFSPA entirely from the state, the political system both in Delhi and Manipur get into the brass task toundermine the strength of non violence through their silence and ignorance. Her's is the longest protest for a social cause by any single individual anywhere in the world. Reacting to her hunger strike, and the public support across the globe, the frustrated  Mr. Okram Ibobi Singh, the Chief Minister told in the Manipur State Assembly that the state government had to spend around Rs 147,000 in two years to keep Sharmila 'alive'. We are sure; the Britishers never said such thing against Gandhiji. Neither the security agencies, nor the political class have learned the meaning and experience of non violence, except using it as a debit card.   

Our organisations' initiative for establishing 'Testimonial Therapy' has helped in empowering victims of torture and their psychological rehabilitation. While advocating for 'Right to Rehabilitation' of the victim, we stand solidly behind the rational and democratic demands of the people. Working with the victims and meeting cross section of the people of the state including Ms Sharmila, Co-awardees of Gwangju Human Rights Award, we had the realization of the deepening frustration of the people against the main land Indians. The centre might claim, but the state does not function. Systemic failure is complete.  The government both at the state and at the centre aptly replicates the three monkeys of Gandhiji for all wrong reasons.

PVCHR and wide angle therefore requests you to:

1) Encourage the Government of India to immediately withdraw the Armed Forces (Special Powers) Act, 1958;
2) Suggest the government to constitute an independent agency to investigate and prosecute cases of human rights violations committed by the state agencies in Manipur;
3) Recommend the government to implement the recommendations made by the Justice B. P. Jeevan Reddy Commission submitted to the government in 2005;
4) Urge the government to simultaneously find a political solution to the problems affecting rule of law in Manipur though a process of interactive dialogue with the people and their leaders, thereby creating an environment of mutual respect and understanding. Necessary to believe that absence of violence does not mean absence of conflict. 
With warm regards,
Dr. Lenin Raghuvanshi, Executive Director, PVCHR, Varanasi
Mr Montu  Ahanthem, Secretary, Wide Angle, Manipur

We have communicated  our grievances, demanded justice for the victims and argued for a just, democratic, systemic response to the larger issues of the state time to time through letters to people who matter, or writing blogs, which are mentioned below. 

· India: Please take immediate action to save the life of the Female Human Rights Defender in Manipur, India.
http://pvchr.blogspot.com/2009/08/india-please-take-immediate-action-to_19.html

· Thanks from the mothers of Manipur to you
http://testimony-india.blogspot.com/2009/08/thanks-from-mothers-of-manipur-to-you.html
· PVCHR actions against torture in Manipurhttp://testimony-india.blogspot.com/2009/08/pvchr-actions-against- torture-in.html

· Open letter in the matter of Manipurhttp://testimony-india.blogspot.com/2009/08/open-letter-in-matter-of-manipur_02.html

http://pvchr.blogspot.com/2009/08/petition-in-murder-in-plain-sight-at.html

http://www.tehelka.com/story_main42.asp?filename=Ne080809murder_in.asp

Open letter to Shri Rahul Gandhi for repeal of AFSA on 2 August 2009.Please visit:

 http://testimony-india.blogspot.com/2009/08/open-letter-in-matter-of-manipur_02.html

German Sanjenbam a victim of HIV/AIDS discrimination

Case story of German Sanjenbam

Sanjenbam German Singh alias Noinoisana is a 15 years old double orphan from Uripok Tourangbam leikai, studying in class 8 at St. Savio School, Lamphel. His parents had died 10 years ago. His father was a drug user and later on both his parents became HIV positive and died. He too contacted the disease from his parents and was on ART treatment.

He was stigmatize, discriminated and tortured by his own near & dear ones, after the death of his parents he was living with his uncle & aunty. He was treated very badly and was made to do all the hard works including the daily household works. He was not provided proper food & clothing, they use to scold him and even beat him and was not allowed to mingle with other children in the family saying that he will spread HIV virus to other members of the family. He was blamed for every small thing, his aunty even spread the rumor that he had molested her daughter even use to hide and throw away his ART medicines. Her main intention was that if ART is not provided to him he will die soon and his parental property can be taken away by them.

After so much sufferings and torture in the hands of his uncle and aunt, he no longer could bear the physical torture and one day he ran away to his maternal grandmother’s house at Malom. He stayed there for few days, on 5^th April 2010, his cousin brother (aunt’s son) and some other persons came to his maternal grandmother’s house and took him along with them on the charged of molesting her cousin sister, nobody knew about his whereabouts, on the next day morning of 7^th April 2010 he was found brutally murdered, his face and head were smashed beyond recognition. There is a big suspicion that his uncle and aunty were directly involved in this brutal murder.

The incident of this Boy brought a huge outcry in the State of Manipur. Many NGO’s and other civil society organizations came out strongly against this brutal act and demanded that the culprits be booked and punished. On 19^th of April 2010 a huge public rally was jointly organized by NGO’s working in the field of Drug and HIV/AIDS and submitted a memorandum to the Chief Minister of Manipur for framing of state policy to protect the Right of Children living with HIV/AIDS.

Note: How an innocent child who has been on ART has been murdered mercilessly for the sake of some property/land by his own near and dear ones and who also showed/act as his care giver in the eyes of the society.   

TESTIMONY OF HEMAM NAREN

I, Shri Hemam Naren, aged about 32 years from Moirang Kiyam Leikai, P.O. /P.S. Bishnupur, Manipur, am the first son of Shri H.Iboyaima and Ekasini Devi. I am a victim of police and army torture.

The incident happened at 11pm on 17^th July 2008 midnight, when I was sleeping in my bedroom, four Army Personnel from 7^th battalion Assam Rifles suddenly entered my house and flashed the torchlight on my face. They asked me “Is your name Naren?” at that moment; an army personnel handcuffed my hands and threatened me to be silence and not to inform any of my family member. They blindfolded me and pushed me inside their vehicle. I was so scared and thought it was my last day, after reaching their camp they tied my hands, blindfolded my eyes and pushed me into the interrogation cell. On the next morning they untied my hands and freed my eyes. At that moment I came to know that I was at Moirang Khunou army camp. A officer came to the room where I was holdup and gave me a cup of tea asking me my army number but I told him that I was not associated with any underground group. Then, they started beating brutally by asking again and again ‘what is your army number ?’. I beg them to stop beating me, I felt unconscious, when I regain consciousness they started beating me again. I could not bear their torture anymore, at last to get away from torture I gave a number blindly, then they stopped torturing and handed me to the Moirang Police Station, I spent six days in Moirang Police Station after that they shifted me in the Sajiwa Jail and charged me that I was involved in the army ambushed at Sugnu and Thinungei. I was released from Sajiwa Jail only when my family paid a sum of Rs. 30,000 to the authority.

After some months of the incident, one night on October 2008, 6th JAT Regiment came to my home and arrested me again. I told them that I was a bail out person but they didn’t listen to me. They took me to the Ngangkhalawai Army Camp and started torturing me just like before. On the next day I was handed over to Moirang Police Station again and put up in the custody for ten days. Then I was produced at Bishnupur District Court and charged me on various cases, I was released on bailed after giving the security bond.

After going through the tortured by police and army personnel, I can not sleep in the night when ever I hear the sound of vehicle, I feel I am still suffering the trauma. As a tortured victim I would like to express my views and feeling to all the organisation working on the field of Human Rights that this testimony may provide a message to all those who have faced the same tortured like me to stand up and tell our stories to the world that we shall get justice one day.

Advocacy on Proper Health Care Services

Advocacy programme

4 hours, 43 minutes, 28 seconds ago

IMPHAL, March 30: A one day advocacy programme on “The proper healthcare services” was held at conference hall of JN Hospital today with the health care service providers of JN Hospital especially with the matrons, sisters, nurses and other staffs organised by the WIDE ANGLE.

Resource persons at the advocacy meet strongly observed the need to use proper terminology relating to HIV/AIDS. They also urged media to use proper language and terms relating to HIV. Other important points highlighted during the meet was that sanitization/awareness and advocacyplay an important role in disclosing the status of an individual. stigma & discrimination which also disturbs the environment of health care services.
 
An appeal was further made by WIDE ANGLE to provide the necessities needed by the institution to have a workable atmosphere.

The organiser also made fervent appeal to the underground outfits to let Manipur a drug free zone by giving no obstructions to health care sector so that health care providers could render their services freely and successfully.  

'9 mm pistol and three live round found from the victim' this statement by the Police in all the encountering killing is very suspicious.

UN Special Rapporteur alerted on arbitrary killings in Manipur

4 hours, 14 minutes, 9 seconds ago

IMPHAL, March 24: the Asian Human Rights Commission has alerted the UN Special Rapporteur on extra judicial detentions and killings in Manipur and urged the people of the country to send letters to various dignitaries of the state as well as Union government as part of a campaign to end state violence of the nature.
The letter circulated on the internet detailed the condition of a very recent suspected case of fake encounter killing by commandos of the Manipur police.
The letter said the AHRC has received information concerning the illegal arrest and alleged murder of another person by state police, a release said.
It said it is widely suspected that his killing was part of a combined operation between the Manipur State Police Commando Unit and officers of the 21 Assam Rifles (AR).
Giving details the release said on 14 March 2010 at around 9:30pm Mr. Chongtham Nanao (also known as Sanjoy) and his brother-in-law Bobo were confronted by police; they had finished dining together and were walking between their two houses. Two white vehicles carrying members of the Manipur State Police Commando Unit stopped them at the compound gate of Nanao's house. The officers demanded their identities and asked Bobo whether the person with him was Nanao, but before Bobo could reply the officers seized Nanao and dragged him into their vehicle.
The officers took the men's torch and mobile telephones, warned Bobo not to tell anybody that they had taken Nanao, and drove away, it said.
Back at home Bobo informed his mother and sister about the incident, while Nanao's family met and consulted with the local village head, Ms. Radhe. She contacted Kakching Police Station over telephone at about 10pm but the staff there denied any knowledge of his arrest, it said.
The next morning Kakching police informed Radhe that they had recovered a dead body from the location of an alleged shootout between police and armed militants; they invited her to see the corpse. After she had informed Nanao’s relatives they visited the station and were able to positively identify Nanao.
The local media claimed that a combined team of Thoubal Police Commandos and 21 Assam Rifles (AR) are involved in the murder, the release said.
The police meanwhile, alleged that Nanao belonged to a banned militant organisation, the Kanglei Yaon Kanba Lup (KYKL), and was shot dead in an armed encounter at a place called Nongjubi Hills (under the jurisdiction of Kakching Police Station). The officers further claimed that they recovered a 9mm pistol with three live rounds and a hand grenade from the victim.
That day a group of civilians formed a Joint Action Committee (JAC) in response to the killing; their protest obstructed local traffic. The JAC has also submitted a memorandum to the Chief Minister of Manipur and a written complaint to Superintendent of Police (SP) and the Director General of Police (DGP), demanding an independent inquiry into the incident, the release further said.
It said extrajudicial execution is at an alarmingly high rate in Manipur. Even though there are no reliable statistics for the exact number of persons killed by the state agencies there, credible government reports suggest that it is very high.
In a public statement issued by Mr. Joy Kumar Singh, the Director General of Police in Manipur in November 2009, the officer said that his men had killed at least 260 persons between January and November 2009; he added that those killed were all operatives of underground militant groups, the release said.
The AHRC in its campaign against these arbitrary killings have urged the people to write their concern to the authorities. It said it is also sending an account of the killings to the UN Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions, calling for an intervention in this case.

'9 mm pistol and three live round found from the victim' this statement by the Police in all the encountering killing is very suspicious.

UN Special Rapporteur alerted on arbitrary killings in Manipur

4 hours, 14 minutes, 9 seconds ago

IMPHAL, March 24: the Asian Human Rights Commission has alerted the UN Special Rapporteur on extra judicial detentions and killings in Manipur and urged the people of the country to send letters to various dignitaries of the state as well as Union government as part of a campaign to end state violence of the nature.
The letter circulated on the internet detailed the condition of a very recent suspected case of fake encounter killing by commandos of the Manipur police.
The letter said the AHRC has received information concerning the illegal arrest and alleged murder of another person by state police, a release said.
It said it is widely suspected that his killing was part of a combined operation between the Manipur State Police Commando Unit and officers of the 21 Assam Rifles (AR).
Giving details the release said on 14 March 2010 at around 9:30pm Mr. Chongtham Nanao (also known as Sanjoy) and his brother-in-law Bobo were confronted by police; they had finished dining together and were walking between their two houses. Two white vehicles carrying members of the Manipur State Police Commando Unit stopped them at the compound gate of Nanao's house. The officers demanded their identities and asked Bobo whether the person with him was Nanao, but before Bobo could reply the officers seized Nanao and dragged him into their vehicle.
The officers took the men's torch and mobile telephones, warned Bobo not to tell anybody that they had taken Nanao, and drove away, it said.
Back at home Bobo informed his mother and sister about the incident, while Nanao's family met and consulted with the local village head, Ms. Radhe. She contacted Kakching Police Station over telephone at about 10pm but the staff there denied any knowledge of his arrest, it said.
The next morning Kakching police informed Radhe that they had recovered a dead body from the location of an alleged shootout between police and armed militants; they invited her to see the corpse. After she had informed Nanao’s relatives they visited the station and were able to positively identify Nanao.
The local media claimed that a combined team of Thoubal Police Commandos and 21 Assam Rifles (AR) are involved in the murder, the release said.
The police meanwhile, alleged that Nanao belonged to a banned militant organisation, the Kanglei Yaon Kanba Lup (KYKL), and was shot dead in an armed encounter at a place called Nongjubi Hills (under the jurisdiction of Kakching Police Station). The officers further claimed that they recovered a 9mm pistol with three live rounds and a hand grenade from the victim.
That day a group of civilians formed a Joint Action Committee (JAC) in response to the killing; their protest obstructed local traffic. The JAC has also submitted a memorandum to the Chief Minister of Manipur and a written complaint to Superintendent of Police (SP) and the Director General of Police (DGP), demanding an independent inquiry into the incident, the release further said.
It said extrajudicial execution is at an alarmingly high rate in Manipur. Even though there are no reliable statistics for the exact number of persons killed by the state agencies there, credible government reports suggest that it is very high.
In a public statement issued by Mr. Joy Kumar Singh, the Director General of Police in Manipur in November 2009, the officer said that his men had killed at least 260 persons between January and November 2009; he added that those killed were all operatives of underground militant groups, the release said.
The AHRC in its campaign against these arbitrary killings have urged the people to write their concern to the authorities. It said it is also sending an account of the killings to the UN Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions, calling for an intervention in this case.

'9 mm pistol and three live round found from the victim' this statement by the Police in all the encountering killing is very suspicious.

UN Special Rapporteur alerted on arbitrary killings in Manipur

4 hours, 14 minutes, 9 seconds ago

IMPHAL, March 24: the Asian Human Rights Commission has alerted the UN Special Rapporteur on extra judicial detentions and killings in Manipur and urged the people of the country to send letters to various dignitaries of the state as well as Union government as part of a campaign to end state violence of the nature.
The letter circulated on the internet detailed the condition of a very recent suspected case of fake encounter killing by commandos of the Manipur police.
The letter said the AHRC has received information concerning the illegal arrest and alleged murder of another person by state police, a release said.
It said it is widely suspected that his killing was part of a combined operation between the Manipur State Police Commando Unit and officers of the 21 Assam Rifles (AR).
Giving details the release said on 14 March 2010 at around 9:30pm Mr. Chongtham Nanao (also known as Sanjoy) and his brother-in-law Bobo were confronted by police; they had finished dining together and were walking between their two houses. Two white vehicles carrying members of the Manipur State Police Commando Unit stopped them at the compound gate of Nanao's house. The officers demanded their identities and asked Bobo whether the person with him was Nanao, but before Bobo could reply the officers seized Nanao and dragged him into their vehicle.
The officers took the men's torch and mobile telephones, warned Bobo not to tell anybody that they had taken Nanao, and drove away, it said.
Back at home Bobo informed his mother and sister about the incident, while Nanao's family met and consulted with the local village head, Ms. Radhe. She contacted Kakching Police Station over telephone at about 10pm but the staff there denied any knowledge of his arrest, it said.
The next morning Kakching police informed Radhe that they had recovered a dead body from the location of an alleged shootout between police and armed militants; they invited her to see the corpse. After she had informed Nanao’s relatives they visited the station and were able to positively identify Nanao.
The local media claimed that a combined team of Thoubal Police Commandos and 21 Assam Rifles (AR) are involved in the murder, the release said.
The police meanwhile, alleged that Nanao belonged to a banned militant organisation, the Kanglei Yaon Kanba Lup (KYKL), and was shot dead in an armed encounter at a place called Nongjubi Hills (under the jurisdiction of Kakching Police Station). The officers further claimed that they recovered a 9mm pistol with three live rounds and a hand grenade from the victim.
That day a group of civilians formed a Joint Action Committee (JAC) in response to the killing; their protest obstructed local traffic. The JAC has also submitted a memorandum to the Chief Minister of Manipur and a written complaint to Superintendent of Police (SP) and the Director General of Police (DGP), demanding an independent inquiry into the incident, the release further said.
It said extrajudicial execution is at an alarmingly high rate in Manipur. Even though there are no reliable statistics for the exact number of persons killed by the state agencies there, credible government reports suggest that it is very high.
In a public statement issued by Mr. Joy Kumar Singh, the Director General of Police in Manipur in November 2009, the officer said that his men had killed at least 260 persons between January and November 2009; he added that those killed were all operatives of underground militant groups, the release said.
The AHRC in its campaign against these arbitrary killings have urged the people to write their concern to the authorities. It said it is also sending an account of the killings to the UN Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions, calling for an intervention in this case.